Wednesday, 31 May 2017

The Jews continue their endless scheming to suppress free speech. At the moment, their favourite instrument for this purpose is the "Working Definition of Antisemitism", dreamed up years ago by a professor at Tel Aviv University, which the Jews, through relentless lobbying, have had officially endorsed in Britain and now, perhaps soon, by the EU parliament. You should familiarise yourself with the saga of the "Working Definition" if you do not know it already. See these articles (link, link, link).
Jewish groups have called on members of the European Parliament to support the adoption of the international Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism when it's put to vote on Thursday. “We fundamentally believe that the absence of accepted definitions of antisemitism in the legislation of some member states and indeed, the European Union itself, acts as a major obstacle in addressing the real security concerns of our communities and thereby preventing the efficient use of resources by governments in their primary role to protect their citizens,” wrote representatives of Jewish communities in EU Member States, led by EJC President Dr. Moshe Kantor. 
The IHRA formulated the definition last May [this is a lie, see linked articles] amid concerns of rising antisemitism, in an effort to clamp down on discriminatory or prejudicial behavior that might fall between the cracks due to unclear or differing definitions of antisemitism. 
The IHRA definition adopted by the group’s 31 member countries reads: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.” 
The EJC letter notes that 24 European Union states are members of the IHRA and therefore signatories to the IHRA definition. “We believe that the affirmation by the European Parliament and the support of all its political groupings of this clear, recognised and effective tool in fighting the scourge of Antisemitism will send an important message to those in our communities concerned for their security and their fundamental rights in Europe and be a facilitator for the important measures required both at the legislative and the practical security level for all Member States to tackle antisemitism,” the signatories wrote to the MEPs. 
The AJC Transatlantic Institute also released a call to the MEPs on Tuesday, denying claims by critics that the definition limits free speech. “Those who falsely claim the working definition limits freedom of expression are basically demanding the freedom to demonize Israel and to hold Jews collectively responsible for Israel’s actions, real or imagined--in other words they claim the right to engage in antisemitism,” said Daniel Schwammenthal, Director of the AJC Transatlantic Institute. 
"The European Parliament has a chance and duty this Thursday to clearly reject such anti-Jewish hate speech. This is a matter of urgency as within living memory of the Holocaust, the remnants of Europe’s Jewish communities have endured a steep rise in antisemitic terrorism, attacks and incidents,” Schwammenthal added.

Here are some extracts from the "Working Definition of Antisemitism".
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. 
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. 
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. 
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). 
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. 
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.


  1. Essentially, they want silence any acknowledgement of the powerful part played by Jewish lobbyists and Jewish lobby groups in various congresses, parliaments and governments especially in the West, because this would reveal the degree to which they push for hostilities to be commenced or supported, either in Europe or the Middle East which impact negatively on the native citizens therein.

    Also, they do not want any acknowledgement in public of the very high percentage of Jewish ownership of media (for example,the Bonnier family (original name: Hirschel) on its own web site lists its various holdings in all forms of media communications, these extend beyond Sweden (where they originally started) to also encompass large parts of media in the rest of Scandinavia and the Baltic States. Ditto the US with regard to media giants.

    As has been noted, this supression of freedom of speech is based on Jewish law (halakah): lashon hara, which contends that nothing may be spoken or heard, even if it is the truth, if by making it known, this would have a bad influence or effect upon the community. In other words, just doing their bit to protect their interests. So many of the politicians are either beholden to them or have some Jewish familial background (Cameron, Sarkozy, Merkel, etc). And, of course, there is their interpretation of historical events which, given the exageration found in the Talmud re supposed atrocities committed against Jews, should give some pause for thought. And, the freedom to discuss the issue.

    1. "there is their interpretation of historical events"
      Like Exodus

    2. Fairytale Exaggeration. YES.
      Documentary "Defamation" A jewish researcher approaches the ADL to investigate the actual occurrences and frequency of antisemitism. ADL spends 70 million annually "exposing antisemitism" dramatically insisting there is a dangerous steep rise, yet could not supply a single example of it to the documentary maker. Not even while spending 70 million dollars "searching."
      Defamation (english)
      Jews do so many things to absurd extremes including exaggeration, as well as their paranoia based demands to be treated like Royalty because they believe their own
      grandiose exaggerations.Related to their natural acting tendency .The fear is likely a genetic anxiety, a chronic fear due to bad inbred chemistry,yet they also cultivate it in their children by pilgrimages to Auschwitz.The children grow up to paint swastikas on their doors at College screaming their victimhood and are frequently exposed as hoaxers-- Haaretz.
      Its worse than Indian beggars crippling their own children so they can earn more.
      Jews aggressively beg that they are the greatest victims of all demanding the greatest privileges.