Sunday, 15 May 2016

We're so used to being the outsiders forced to skulk on obscure blogs and do without the paraphernalia of power that a professionally-made documentary making the case for Brexit provided an immediate thrill on novelty grounds alone. Unfortunately it doesn't do much more than that. This has to be classed as a massive opportunity lost.

It's full of Adam Smith Institute-type free market crap about how the EU stifles business with excess regulation as well as infantile depictions of lazy continentals. There's nothing about infringements of sovereignty, nothing about out-of-control human rights madness. Most importantly, there is nothing about the immigration invasion except a brief reference to the rise of "nasty far right" parties on the continent, the implication being that we should leave the EU to get away from them. And the rise of these "nasty far right" parties is attributed not to the invasion of Europe by Africans and Asians but the economic stagnation supposedly caused by the aformentioned "stifling EU bureaucracy".

The documentary was made by Martin Durkin. I don't know whether it was his own initiative or whether he was just a gun for hire but, if the latter, he was definitely the wrong pick. Just about every documentary he has ever made has been pushing the case for market libertarianism. I should make a post sometime about the corruption of real Conservatism by free market zealotry, much of it driven by Jews.

As things are, I'm not sure this film helps the Brexit case at all. With reptilian Oriental types like Michael Howard prominently featured in it, it might even drive people towards Remain.


  1. There are a bunch of rich british located people who doesn't want to be under EU control, because they want to have even less regulation. Thats it. Just like in the Roman Republic (remember Crassus, Pompey, etc.) politics are driven by rich people, by "patrons" and not the other way around. It is the elite that drives politics, and not the majority of the people. It is not a coincidence that the mayor of London, Boris Jonson, was tottaly against the EU. The mayor of London is known to be the mouth of the London City.

    The more i think about it, the more i believe that politics and trends are driven by elites, and not by the normal people, who are just sheep. After all, humans are just primates, and primates are ruled by alpha males.

    According to this view, it was elite corruption, decadence and betrayal that caused the destruction of europeans in the EU and the US. On the other hand, the elite in Russia, Poland, Turkey, China, South Korea, or Japan, did not betray their own people. All of their elites are mostly nationalist elites, so those peoples will continue to exist.

    For example i recently heard a chinese who said that the chinese had no respect for Obama (cause he was black), and not much respect for Hillary Clinton either, (because she was woman).
    Accoring to one poll, mainland chinese would vote for Trump if they could (do not mistake them with chinese in the US, who vote for the Left due to the fact that they are a minority there).

    So it is very interesting how people around the world think. Right now, non-westerners are way more nationalist and traditional compared westerners. And my point is that this is cultivated by their elites. Their elites themselves are nationalist and "bigoted". The driving force of liberalism and the Left these days are paradoxically, not "red" Russia and China, but westerners and the West.

    The spat between Russia and the West is basically a spat between their elites. Western elites demanded subordination to the globalist project and total acceptance of "western values", while russian elites rejected that, because they believe that those "values" will weaken and ultimately desintegrate the country, and with that their hold on power will go away too. So russian elites started to support nationalism, religion, etc. in order to stabilise and consolidate the country in the face of the hostile West, the Islamic world, rising China, etc.
    My point is that the order for the general direction towards nationalism and traditionalism in Russia came from above.

    So my speculatuion is that nationalism depends on the elites. If elites want it, then there will be nationalism in the country, and if elites do not want it, then there wont be nationalism in the country.

    1. " On the other hand, the elite in Russia, Poland, Turkey, China, South Korea, or Japan, did not betray their own people. "

      BIG LOL !

      Moscow - Europe's Muslim/non-white Capital

      _ You knew that only 30% of the Russian population is white / Slavic?

      _ You know that majoritary ethnic Russian women are married out of your (40% of Muscovites for example) race?

      Here are a few photos of white ethnic Russian girls with russian asians (Yakuts, Buryats, Kalmyks, Tatars, Bashkirs, Chuvash) and mestizos

      white russian girl and buryat

      white russian girl and tatar (or bashkir)

      white russian girl and tatar (or bashkir)

      white russian girl and korean

      white russian girl and mestizo

      white russian girl and armenian

      _ You knew that in Russia have 2 million abortions every year and the vast majority are of ethnic Russian women married with ethnic Russian man ?

      _ You knew during the Putin government in less than 10 years 15 million illegal immigrants settled around Moscow?

      _ You knew Putin created laws that criminalize criticism of the immigration and because of this more than 2000 Russian nationalists today live in penitentiaries?

      _you knew Putin banned the existence of political parties and nationalist movements so that many existing parties were extinguished by operation of law?

      Ethnic Russian is a people on the verge of extinction and big part of it is the fault of your beloved Putin.

      Putin is no different from the Zionist who control the West.
      he oppresses own people(slavs) while licking ass of the Jews.

    2. _Russia has World’s 2nd largest number of Immigrants – UN Study
      _ Ideology of Novorossiya: internationalism and anti-fascism
      _ Russia: 8 millions drug users, world’s top heroin consumer. Krokodil epidemic.
      ”More than 70,000 people die each year in Russia from drug abuse, about 30,000 of them from heroin, according to the FSKN. Millions more suffer from dependency, with an estimated 8.5 million drug addicts in 2013, according to an FSKN report. ”
      _Russia: the hunt for thought crimes in file-sharing networks & other news of police-state mayhem
      _ Russia’s chief rabbi thanks Putin for support to Jews
      _ Russia: patriotic publisher Viktor Korchagin goes on trial for a book about Jews
      _ Jews want more sinagogues in Crimea
      _ Russia spends millions for mini football among migrants to increase tolerance
      _Total ban of white symbols in Russia


    3. Putin criminalizes holohoax,7340,L-4516656,00.html

      He excuses Stalin and construction of a new monument tohonom:

      He sees Lenin as a sacredrelik:

      He cooperates militarily with Israel: http: // Serdyukov /

    4. Putin is not even white, take a look at his face it is obvious he has tatar heritage or maybe kalmyk or some other mongoloid ethnicity. Putin is anti-russian and anti-every other white nation, he is one of the most jew influenced leaders in the history of the world even more than the USA, trust me if any of you lived in russia you would hate putin he DOES NOT represent the interest of russians, caucasians or even tatars at all he just represents the interest of the rich and the jews

    5. Those are valid arguments, but first: you never adressed the other countries that i mentioned.
      And second, the behavior of Russia during the refugee crisis is very different than that of the EU. They took very few syrian refugees (1600) and they critisized EU refugee policies.

      Russia Unwelcoming for Syrians Seeking Refuge

      Russia’s immigration chief lashes out at Europe over migration
      “Practicing family reunification and offering refugees generous benefits without integrating them into the labor market, the EU did not expect that such a great number of people would claim these rights. This was clearly a mistake. The policy of multiculturalism has failed.”

      Romodanovsky accuses EU leaders of willfully ignoring the “differences in culture, religious traditions, and customs.”

      “Note the defiant behavior of refugees and their growing claims and demands. What happened in Germany on New Year’s Eve is a striking example of this,” said the official, referring to the mass sex assaults in Cologne perpetrated largely by members of ethnic minorities during that holiday.

      “People in Europe are getting restless. The economic situation is difficult as it is, unemployment is high, and yet their governments have to support immigrants from Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, northern Africa, and provide them with housing and jobs.”

      So i think that there are two crucial difference, between Russian and Western immigration policies.

      In the West, there is deliberate and massive importation of blacks, indians, arabs, etc.
      In Russia, immigration comes mostly from the neighboring countries, that were once part of the russian empire or the USSR.
      I do not see (in Russia) deliberate massive importation of blacks, arabs or indians, like in the West.

      And secondly, many in the governing elites of Europe directly told the refugees: "please come here". I do not see someone in the russian governing elites urging refugees to come to Russia.

      And third, you should explain why so many jews attack Putin, such as Soros, Bernar Henry Levy, the Neocons, most of the jew owned media, etc. I know that he has close relations with Israel, but i think that he does that in order not to be called a new Hitler (and he was still called a new Hitler by Hillary Clinton, Prince Charles, Gary Kasparov (a jew) etc.) and not to increase the hysteria against him. Do not forget that he has close relations with Iran, and i never saw a jewish puppet who was friendly to Iran.

      And if he is jewish puppet, why is he not impementing the gay rights thing? Jews everywhere are extremely supportive of gay rights, it does not make sense for him to be a jewish puppet and to be fostering an anti-gay sentiments at the same time.

      And, as i said above, i see lots of elites calling Putin "a New Hitler" .

      I don't see why would they call him like that if he was a jewish puppet.

  2. Diversity, están causando muchos problemas al Reino Unido.

    Las políticas sionistas de la Unión Europea ya no tienen fuerza ante la evidencia de los sucesos contra los occidentales.

    Igual ocurre en otras naciones de Occidente, pero que los grandes portales de información no informan a los ciudadanos.