Friday, 21 July 2017

The confected controversy that has followed the release of the BBC stars' salary data gives us a perfect insight into the mechanism of tyranny that has established itself within our civilisation. For those who haven't followed it, the data revealed that two-thirds of the corporation's top earners were men. This provoked predictable cries of outrage about sexist discrimination and a declaration from the BBC's Director General that "more needs to be done".

Not a single person dares to say that perhaps the men earn more because they are better at what they do. Just as, when the question of negroes being stopped and searched disproportionately by the police is raised, no one, not even the police themselves when obliged to defend themselves, dares to make the blindingly obvious point that the reason negroes are stopped and searched disproportionately is that they commit crime disproportionately. Indeed, in both Britain and the US, the negro share of the prison population is 5 times their share of the general population. The fact that this statistic is virtually identical in two distinct countries with very different legal systems, cultures and economies strongly suggests that genetic factors lie behind it. But no one can say so out loud

This is the mechanism of tyranny.

Step 1: You define a religious dogma, in this case that all groups of people have exactly the same distribution of genetic characteristics, including natural abilities and behavioural inclinations.

Step 2: You create an enforcement mechanism: a battery of hate speech laws, professional codes of practice, complaint-filing NGOs and oppressive social conventions the combined effect of which is to destroy the life of anyone who dares to publicly dissent from your dogma.

Step 3: You then cite evidence pointing out that observable factual reality doesn't seem to correspond with your own dogma. With your tyrannical enforcement measures in place, no one will dare to suggest that this may be because the dogma isn't actually true. On the contrary, everyone, in public at least, assumes that the dogma must be true. The priestly caste of this Cult of Equality then smirkingly invite contradiction, knowing they can destroy anyone who dares to dissent.

Step 4: You insist that since facts don't correspond to the unchallengable dogma, the facts must be altered to fit it. The failure of brown people and women to achieve apparent parity of performance with white men can only be because these evil white men are engaged in a conspiracy to oppress and exclude everyone else. It could not possibly be because white men are actually better at what they do, because that would contradict the dogma. The power of the state must be brought in to correct this anomaly. Legal privilege, in effect, must be enacted for everyone other than white men.

This is the mechanism of tyranny. Ever more demands are made for privileged job allocation based on generic birth characteristics rather than individual merit. For the Left, or the Cult of Equality as I like to call it, this represents a paradoxical return to roots. Because it was in rebellion against exactly this form of inherited privilege that the Left began, in complaints about the nobility's exemption from taxation or forced labour in the run-up to the French revolution. They insisted that birthright entitlements be stripped away and a new society created in which people would be judged as individuals. They also deplored the connection between Faith and Power, the supposedly oppressive alliance between the Christian church and its defence of the ruling class.

Now we have come full circle. The left have created a new Religion of Equality. Its rituals are the Holocaust commemorations, candle-lit vigils for immigrants, Black Lives Matter marches. Its priestly caste are the anti-racist anti-white activists, feminists, human rights agitators and thought police. This Church of Equality now demands the reinstatement of inherited privilege for the new nobility - those with the "protected characteristics" that mark them out as belonging to the new aristrocracy of victimhood: Muslims, women, brownskins, gays and Jews. White men are the serfs who must toil in the fields for their new rulers.


5 comments:

  1. "Now we have come full circle. The left have created a new Religion of Equality. Its rituals are the Holocaust commemorations, candle-lit vigils for immigrants, Black Lives Matter marches. Its priestly caste are the anti-racist anti-white activists, feminists, human rights agitators and thought police. This Church of Equality now demands the reinstatement of inherited privilege for the new nobility - those with the "protected characteristics" that mark them out as belonging to the new aristrocracy of victimhood: Muslims, women, brownskins, gays and Jews. White men are the serfs who must toil in the fields for their new rulers."

    I'm not sure that the left would even exist without jews. MacDonald certainly thinks that communism without jews would not have been successful, when you look at the number of jewish feminists you start to think the same thing for feminism too. The jews wage warfare against the dominant group by creating coalitions of minorities. Then they call this coalition "the Left." Therefore the Left is not "Left", but just a tool in the hands of jews for waging ethnic warfare against the dominant group.

    They create "Left" when they are the minority, and nationalism when they are the majority, as in Israel. They create whatever works and serves their interests in a particular environment. The Left serves their interests when they are a minority, and nationalism serves their interests when they are a majority. Therefore the Left is just smokes and mirrors, variuos minorities glued toghether by jews and manipulated by jews, and the real purpose behind this construct is nationalism and ethnic warfare - something that is quite ordinary and as old as the sun. The only extraordinary thing is how jews are able to mask their selfish ethnic interests behind "noble causes", or, "the Left".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Jews have certainly instrumentalised the Cult of Equality but I'm not convinced they created it. Jews weren't very powerful at the time of the French revolution. It was the French revolution that liberated them from the restraints that had been placed upon them. There are indications, here and there, of Jews favouring the French revolution and revolutionary forces, in Italy for example. But I haven't seen any compelling presentation of the case that the made the difference in creating it or making it "successful".

      Jewish authors (notably Jonathan Israel) try to trace the intellectual lineage of Equality Cult ideas to the renegade Jew Spinoza. But I'd say this is more a case of the usual Jewish ethnocentric rewriting of history to magnify the Jewish role. (Exactly the same thing that Muslims do, incidentally, with their bogus claims to have invented everything.)

      Delete
    2. "But I'd say this is more a case of the usual Jewish ethnocentric rewriting of history to magnify the Jewish role."

      Yup, agree with that, what i was thinking is that i'm not sure how successful those movements will be without jewish support. The point about the French Revolution is good, but maybe other later movements would have failed without jewish support, who knows?

      The desire for equality also comes from psychology: people who are inferior to something demand that they are made equal to their betters. So in that sense, there will always be demands for "equality", as long as there are human differences and "better" or "worse". Jealousy and envy are part of human nature.

      The word equality is an eufemism that maskes the real intention: "give me your stuff" or "give me your position". It is a type of parasitism using verbal manipulation forms.

      Now, people can not go and openly say: "give me your stuff". This may cause a strong reaction. So they use manipulative words and eufemisms in order to manipulate psychologically and cause a softer reaction.

      "I want equal pay" sounds better than "i want someone to give me money and jobs even if i do not deserve them". This is why people/groups who parasitise use this type of verbal reasoning.

      But i do believe that jews empowered this type of verbal parasitism, jews have high verbal intelligence and are the best at hiding their interests with benevolent words. I think that many groups started to copy jewish behavior and that it is the minorities, feminists, gays, and so on, that copy jews and use their tactics in order to obtain stuff too. Basically jews create the verbal pinnacle and then other groups start to use those words and tactics too. You can clearly see that in muslims and how they copied jews and started to use words like "islamophobia".

      All of those words are about verbal parasitism and verbal control and manipulation of white men. This is how all of those groups obtain stuff from them. Only white men do not use this type of verbal parasitism.

      Its like a situation where one virus (HIV) busted the immune system of white men (with verbal/emotional methods) and then other forces started to use the opening in order to invade the body/the cell too.

      Delete
    3. Without judaism, there would be no communism, because they are one-and-the-same. Rabbi Stephen Wise said himself that judaism is communism. jews and their communist tactics have been in play in the courts of the kings and queens of Europe for at least 600 years. Because of this, its virtually certain that there were, in fact, jews involved in and leading the so-called French revolution (liberty, equality, fraternity)which was nothing more than a Bolshevik takeover of France. Fraternity is another tip off. The idea of universal brotherhood, that we're all the same, is another tenet of jewish communism. jews need to convince everyone they're equal so that they can then set themselves above everyone else. As Orwell said, we're all equal, but some of us are more equal than others. They create and incite various victim groups to fight for their "rights" and "equality" against the establishment to create a diversion for the public that does not see how the jews hide behind the chaos they instigate, destroying the finances, culture, and freedoms of their nation. The drive for "equality" and instilling a false sense of victimhood in people is crucial to this divide-and-conquer strategy that is uniquely jewish. None of the chaos that has happened or is happening in the world would exist without jews. We have thousands of years of history to prove it. The Byzantine Empire is one perfect example, as it thrived for 1000 years without jews. When jews are emancipated and return to any land, the same strategies and degradation begin again. Henry Waton said himself that his people, the jews, are the destroyers. They create nothing. Will the west ever lean? It's the jews.

      Delete
  2. Actually what you are criticizing is the human condition. It is not unique to a single group, race or creed. The evil that is in man is intrinsic and a part of his character. The betrayals can find their counterparts in the late Roman Empire, and similar cycles of corruption, destruction and (sometimes) renewal can be found in China. What is different now is the scope of the betrayal which is matched by secular changes in technology and communication that permit greater tyranny over large areas and long distances. Some may accuse the "Jews" of betraying the societies that they live in, but betrayal is not unique, since this vice is true - at least to some extent - of all men. For there are men in all societies who seek power, control and advantage to the detriment of their neighbor, and sometimes even of their kin.

    This was as true in the bronze age and it is still true today.

    ReplyDelete