Friday, 20 January 2017


At the root of the genocide being inflicted on the European peoples through mass migration is an intellectual genocide that denies their existence as peoples - that is as ancestral communities of descent - by redefining their peoplehood in abstract and artificial terms. Much scholarly effort has been expended highlighting the role of foreigners in the various national histories of Europe's peoples. The aim of this immense propaganda effort is to leave us with the impression that every European people that apparently exists is just an illusion, beneath which lies a mongrelised, hybridised, motley band of migrants, for whose blessings we should be pathetically grateful. A book has just been published in France that enshrines this style of genocidal history that denies the existence of a people: Histoire Mondiale de la France [Global History of France]. Here are some extracts from a review of it that appeared in Le Figaro.
From the first date, the mass is said: the history of France begins...before the history of France. 34,000 years before Jesus Christ! In the cave of Chauvet, in the time of Cro-Magnon "To neutralise the question of origins," declares Boucheron without hesitation. "France before France that dissolves in the beginnings of a mixed and migrant humanity." 
Our "historians" thus give embodiment to the famous antiracist slogan of the 1980s: "We are all immigrants". All migrants. All nomads. No races, no ethnic groups, no peoples. The proof from the void. We mustn't stop there: before Cro-Magnon, there were our friends the Dinosaurs; and then further back the fish. Let us cherish our ancestors the fish! 
In almost 800 pages and 146 dates, there is no deviation from the party line: everything coming from abroad is good. The barbarian invasions are "Germanic migrations"; the defeat of the Gauls allowed them enter into Roman globalisation; the Arab conquerors were much more brilliant than the pitiful Carolingian defenders; the Christian martyrs of Lyon came from elsewhere and Saint Martin was Hungarian. Christian theologians owe everything to the great Talmudist Rachi; the "shameful treaty of Troyes" of 1420 (which gave the kingdom of France to the English monarch) is a beautiful attempt to create perpetual peace through the union of crowns. Descartes is not the incarnation of French genius, but the "witness and actor of a Europe that is reconstituting itself and open to the world." The navy of Colbert and Louis XIV owes it all to sailors born beyond our borders. Versailles is nothing but a mixture of Italian, Spanish, even English influences and the Thousand and One Nights are very French. Even the defeat in 1940 allowed the grotto at Lascaux to be discovered. 
The ancient heroes taken from the "national legend", as Boucheron says with disdain, are buffoons or failures. Nothing happened at Poitiers in 732 except the "illusion of an event"; and Charles Martel is just a "steward of the palace not even crowned surrounded by barons seated on enormous donkeys". The theological criticism of Islam by Christianity is nothing but lies and exaggeration. 
...Our historians, moulded by scientific rigour, in their own way reinvent providential history in the manner of Bossuet, but one in which the all-powerful and benevolent figure of God has been replaced by that of the Foreigner. 
... We started with Cro-Magnon and we finish our grand journey with the tricolour flag. Our historians are not wrong: we will have the choice between the flag and the Chauvet cave; between a France rooted in its history, its culture, its civilisation and a return to the times of the great invasions. The millennial conflict between settled peoples and nomads. And that oh so French secular gulf between the Party of France and the Party of the Foreigner.
The author of the review, incidentally, is a Jew, Eric Zemmour, one of the few Jews I can think of who seems to have committed himself unreservedly to the non-Jewish people he lives among, although a residue of suspicion must always remain.


2 comments:

  1. Yo me quedo, sin duda, con las tesis ( científicas, claro ) de otros científicos que a pesar de ser perseguidos y mirados con la lupa, han sido valientes y no han seguido la misma senda del sistema después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. De hecho nos recuerdan que no hay evidencias de culturas humanas no blancas en la propia Europa. Esto es ; que los feniccios, como se sabe, hace milenios, eran de raza blanca, al igual que los tartessos, etc.

    La localización geográfica no significa nada, máxime cuando hace siglos antes de inventarse el Islam ( que arrastró a otras culturas no blancas ) los beréberes era de raza blanca.

    Acabo de destruir, involuntariamente, e indirectamente : la Historia Mundial de Francia es un minuto, Diversity.

    Leí, hace unos meses, casi un año de tiempo, la noticia de las investigaciones de una famosa cueva en Francia, donde los científicos dejaban claro que no había evidencias de razas diferentes a la raza blanca ( o europea ).

    Hay más, de hecho las pruebas de científicas ( recientes y no tan recientes ) han constatado lo que ya se apuntaba en la mayoría de las obras de investigación ( también científicas ) hace más de un siglo.

    Tan verdad como que los primeros repobladores de Sevilla en el 1248 había miles de franceses y bretones, además de alemanes, y vascos, y astures, y...por haber hubo hasta suecos que se quedaron por motivos de bodas con algunos monarcas castellanos en la ciudad hispalense. Fíjese Diversity, lo que uno aprende y nos decían que el hombre viene del mono ( teoría darvinista ) y resulta que dicha teoría nunca ha sido comprobada ( ni la mosca ni la carne, y sus huevos ). Es más no es ciencia, aunque ocupen estanterías con dicho título en Universidades, hoy.

    Tan verdad como hasta hace poco los vascos podían matarse en Islandia. Lo puede buscar en Mr. Google.

    Estos artículos también están muy interesantes, menos para los innombrables...Por cierto hay quien refirió que algunas políticas anti-occidentales, aparecieron hace siglos ; para destruir la evidencia que los genes de la raza blanca son recesivos*. Es decir que si una persona de raza blanca es alterada con genes de otra raza ; dejará de ser puro, está contaminado, y no volverá a su estado inicial u original de la raza blanca, aunque luego sus descendientes en generaciones se casen o tengan niños puros de raza blanca.


    Es curioso la ciencia, pero la ciencia no miente, de ahí el invento de algunas políticas anti-occidentales. En mi opinión Dios fue racista, porque creó las razas, es evidente, asunto muy positivo : porque ese ser superior entendió que el Racismo es positivo y ya es diversidad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://patriotasoccidentales.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/la_ciencia_al_servicio_de_la_seguridad_o_racismo.jpg

    ReplyDelete