Saturday, 12 November 2016

                                                        


What is the best way to destroy a large and powerful group, such as white people of european descent? You need to divide them first. Make them hate each other, and when they do that, no one will pay attention to the jews in their midst. Feminist ideology is perfect for that aim, as it idiotically divides the world between men and women only, forgetting about the very real racial and ethnic differences that exist. Take IQ for example. According to feminism, white women (with IQ100) are more similar and should feel closer to black women (IQ70), than to white men (IQ100),  just because they are all women. Yet in the real world, as far as intelligence is concerned, white women are closer and more similar to white men, than to black women. As far as IQ is concerned, white women have more similar genes to white men, than to black women.

In nature, real gene competition is not between males and females, but between different species and racial/ethnic groups. Ethnic groups are basically gene clusters, competing with each other. Every competing group is comprised by males and females. The competition goes like this: males and females from genetic group A vs males and females from genetic group B. In nature, there no such thing as a male only specie competing vs a female only specie. The only group competition among advanced organisms is males+females from specie A vs males+females from specie B. And in some ways, the females from genetic group A could have more similar genes to the males from genetic group A (take IQ for example), than to the females from genetic group B. The real division therefore lies not between males and females, but between different species/genetic groups/genetic strains, who are comprised by both males and females, and are competing with each other.

Therefore, it will be critical, if you want to destroy a certain ethnic group (or a gene cluster), to destroy its unity, and to make the females (or males) to side with other competing ethnic groups against their other half. And this is what the jews are trying to do with white people of european descent. This is why jews are heavily involved in feminism. And they are doing are good job at it. But its not perfect. And they are becoming angry, because they can not fully divide white men and white women.

Exit Polls are showing that the majority of US white women (53 vs 43 percent, 10 percent difference) voted for Donald Trump.
http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls/national/president

 While white women are far less nationalist  than white men (63 vs 31 percent of white men voted for Trump, 32 percent difference), this result is still bad for our enemies. White women and white men are not fully divided. White women did not fully side with the jewish led "coalition of minorities" (jews, blacks, latinos, asians, muslims, etc.). And this is a major problem for our enemies. And they reacted.  
                                                     
Have a look at this: the jewess Lena Dunham is angry, because white women narrowly preferred Trump over Clinton. According to this jew, white women should put women first over white people first. A white woman should feel closer to black women, just because they are women, than to white men. Do you know why she wants that? Jews do not really believe in feminism (after all, Israel is a patriarchal country), yet they heavily try to sell it to others. Feminism is just a mask. And behind the mask, the aim is to divide white people against themselves. To make white women become obsessed, jealous and envious of white men, and to forget, that in this world, there are others too. Others, such as the jews, who are their genetic competitor and a parasite living among them. The parasite does not want white women to be aware of it. So it uses the feminism smokescreen, in order to turn the attention of white women and white men against each other, and away from the parasite.

                                                                  
This is why it is important for Dunham, who pretends to be just another white woman, but is actually a parasite living among white women, and secretly wishing them to go away, to divide the world, in the mind of the white woman, between men and women only, and nothing else. Please white women, says the jewess, do not think about jews. Do not think about ethnic and racial differences, where the real competition is. Do not think about IQ differences between the different peoples. Only think about men and women, and the divide between them. Do not think about anything else. I'm the same as you, i'm a white women too, i'm your sister, you should trust me. Vote against those bad white men. Do that for women. We are all together, we are all women, we are all the same. Said the snake to the woman.


                                     

In her own words:

"It is painful on a cellular level knowing those men got what they wanted, just as it’s painful to know you are hated for daring to ask for what is yours. It’s painful to know that white women, so unable to see the unity of female identity, so unable to look past their violent privilege, and so inoculated with hate for themselves, showed up to the polls for him, too. My voice was literally lost when I woke up, squeaky and raw, and I ached in the places that make me a woman, the places where I’ve been grabbed so carelessly, the places we are struggling to call our own."

Lena Dunham Blasts Self-Hating White Women for voting for Trump
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/11/11/lena-dunham-blames-self-hating-white-women-violent-privilege-trump-victory/

Unfortunately, in reality, the jewess Dunham is not the same as the rest of white euro women. She probably has higher IQ than them, especially verbal IQ, which is used for verbally controlling and manipulating other people. She is a part of a different genetic and ethnic group, that has its own interests. And those interests are very different than those of white people of european descent. Her group is the jews, a group that often lives as a parasite inside other groups. Her interests are opposed to those of the rest of normal white women. Currently, jews are trying to get rid of white people, or at least make them despised minorities everywhere, in order to insure that the jews are "safe" and "Hitler could never happen again". They want to get rid of all white people because of their paranoia. To get rid even of those who helped them during WW2. On the other hand, we, white people of european descent, want to continue to exist and to have our own countries. So our interests could never be the same.

Then there is the comedian Samantha Bee, who lives in Jew York, and her real ethnicity is unknown to me, but is suspiciously worried about jewish well-being - the jews are now scared, she says, and the jews are the only ones who can make jokes, she says, and please don't talk about Jesus on jewish Passover, she says.

http://www.nyblueprint.com/comedy-film-television-shabbat-holidays-television/samantha-bee-stings-republican-candidates

                                                       



In her own words: "White people ruined America"

'White people, this is the worst thing we’ve ever - no, I’m sorry, that’s a very high bar. But holy s***! And don’t try to distance yourself from the bad apples and say, "It’s not my fault, I didn’t vote for him. Hashtag not all white people."

'White women, faced with the historic choice between the first female president and a vial of weaponized testosterone said, "I’ll take option B. I just don’t like her,"' said Bee. She then added: 'Hope you got your sticker, ladies. Way to lean out.'

On Full Frontal, Bee discussed the post-election hand-wringing that followed Trump’s victory. “Once you dust for prints, it’s pretty clear who ruined America,” she said. “White people. I guess ruining Brooklyn was just a dry run.”

She continued: “The Caucasian nation showed up in droves to vote for Trump, so I don’t want to hear a goddamn word about black voter turnout. How many times do we expect black people to build our country for us?”

Given that the majority of white women decided to elect Trump, she said: “Let’s get off the floor and get busy, especially you, white women. We’ve got some karma to work off.”

She also rejected the idea that a Trump presidency will lead to a great era for comedy. “Jokes don’t write themselves. Jews write jokes, and they are scared shitless,” she said.

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/nov/10/samantha-bee-donald-trump-white-people

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3923844/White-people-ruined-America-Samantha-Bee-takes-aim-Caucasian-voters-Donald-Trump-s-win-Hillary-Clinton.html

And then there is a white feminist, with unknown ethnicity, called L.V. Anderson, who is angry that white women "sold out the sisterhood" for white men. According to her, white women should side with non-white people against their men. No one asks the big question: how could white women continue to exist, if they side with non-whites against white men?

In her own words:
"Of course, the biggest and saddest reason white women chose Trump over Clinton is simple: racism. Trump tried to pit straight white men against everyone else—women, people of color, people in the LGBTQ community, immigrants—and white women decided they didn’t want to vote on the side of “everyone else.” They wanted to vote on the side of white men. White women decided that defending their position of power as white people was more important than defending their reproductive rights, their sexual autonomy, their access to health care, family leave, and child care. White women bought into Trump’s lies about immigrant rapists and decided they’d rather have the respect of their angry white fathers, brothers, and husbands than the respect of literally everyone else in the world.

The shocking results of the election prove that most white women don’t consider themselves part of the coalition of nonwhite, nonstraight, nonmale voters who were supposed to carry Clinton to a comfortable victory. Most white women still identify more with white men than they do with black women, Latina women, Muslim women, transwomen, and every other woman who will have good reason to fear for her physical safety under a Trump regime."

White Women Sold Out the Sisterhood and the World by Voting for Trump
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/11/09/white_women_sold_out_the_sisterhood_and_the_world_by_voting_for_trump.html

Clearly, this is not about feminism. Feminism is a smokescreen. The real aim is an ethnic aim. Instead of talking just about men and women, this "feminist" is talking about blacks, latinos, muslims (who are the total opposite of feminism), immigrants, people of color, etc. Why put all those ethnic issues into an article about feminism? Why talk about "siding with people of color", if this is about men and women only? Why talk about the "white position of power", if this is about feminism? Because the real aim is ethnic and racial. The end game is ethnic and racial. Its not about women. Its not about men and women.  Its about pursuing ethnic objectives, that have nothing to do with feminism, or the divide between men and women. And what is the real objective?

To get rid of white people. How? By creating a coalition of minorities, and making their white women join that coalition of minorities against their own men. It appears that, at least for now, many white women are not falling for that. And that is a good news. Our enemies are angry, and that is a good news.

We have a lot of work to do. Women still vote far more liberal/left-wing than men do. So one of our most important objectives is to bring back white women to their own people. To the white people of european descent. Because a house divided against itself cannot stand.

Written by Passer by

4 comments:

  1. Excellent article, Passer By, and thank you for expressing it so succinctly. Let us not be fooled by protestations that Jews are scared, worried or feel endangered. Parasites are often adaptable to new circumstances, even over millenia (the Ancient Classical world of the Roman Empire had its own experiences with the Jews and clearly saw them as parasites and a danger to societal stability). This issue of feminism is a critical one and should be thoroughly exposed, as Passer By has done here. Once these points are presented to people, they begin to put together further pieces of the puzzle, often based on their own experiences, and to better understand the degree of manipulation and hostility behind this concept of feminism.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This also explains the creation of homosexuals as a distinct, aggrieved group. It's something that can be wielded against the homogeneity of whites and divide them. It all makes sense... Homosexuality exists in all countries but it is only in the West that it exists as a social construct, an identity with which to cudgel others over the head with. 18% of gays voted for Trump, clearly they put their ethnic interests before their sexuality.

    Wasn't an article published on here some time back about how minority homosexuals outnumber white homosexuals? Maybe the 18% of gays who voted for Trump were white?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, homosexuality is important for jews as it is just another "strange" minority. Jews like strange minorities, (such as transgenders for example). They push for more of these, so that they are not the only "strange minority" and there are more targets around. Gays also serve as a warning system to jews: if someone is attacking gays, they reckon, then he is a probable threat against the jews too. If someone does not like strange minority people, then that someone could one day come after the jews too.

      As jew Charles Silberman pointed out, “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.”

      Minorities usually support other minorities, so thats why jews are supporting gays (and gays are supporting other minorities). All of those minorites supporting each other lead to positive "more minorites" feedback loop, where if you support one minority, then that minority will support other minorities, and thats how their overall influence will increase.

      Gays, for exampe, are known to support immigration. The principle is "i'm a minority, so i will support other minorities".

      The end game is to get rid of any existing majority and to fragment and divide the country into many competing groups, so that "the jews are safe".

      Delete
  3. Another very important reason that jews support and exalt sexual perversions (homosexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism, bisexuality etc) is that sexually perverse behaviour does produce serious sexual diseases which restrict procreation and this is therefore a way of reducing white population growth, and also by encouraging children and teenagers to 'consider' that they 'may' be "gay" (much promoted in school systems in the US and Britain), this, too, is a way of preventing normal sexual interest in the opposite sex. Coupled with encouraging sluthood and abortion, these perverted value systems effectively reduce the overall numbers of white people throughout Western societies.

    Also, I don't think the desire to push sexual perversion is most important as a way of creating more minorities to supposedly protect jews because Judaism (from the Talmud) permits sexual abuse of children by both adult males and females; so stressing sexual perversion to young people is a way of increasing the availability of possible victims of such a belief system.

    ReplyDelete