Sunday, 2 October 2016

Some interesting stories that caught my eye, related to our Jewish friends:
A new study indicates that Jewish donors have given far less to American presidential candidate Donald Trump than they gave to the Republican campaign during the last election. The study, by polling website fivethirtyeight, calculated that Jewish donations to Mr Trump so far make up just eight per cent of what Mitt Romney received during the 2012 race. The report also estimated that just two per cent of donors to the Republican nominee's campaign were Jewish. Meanwhile, Jewish donors to Mrs Clinton's campaign were at ten times that figure, at 20 per cent.

2 per cent is approximately equal to the Jewish share of the US population. The fact that this level of contributions is considered shockingly low indicates how high it is in normal times.

Afro-Jew Jackie Walker has been suspended from the Labour party over her "antisemitism". Her comments that she didn't have a clear definition of what antisemitism was and that she thought Holocaust Memorial Day should also commemorate "other genocides", which apparently it already does, provoked a chorus of outrage from Jews and Judenknechte like John Mann. No one has even attempted to explain why these remarks constituted "antisemitism" but the tyranny we live under is such that truth and reason don't actually matter any more.
Labour MP John Mann called Ms Walker's comments "unacceptable in a modern political party" by any standard. He also suggested the comments had "inspired waves of anti-Semitic and racist backlash including Holocaust denial". 
But former London mayor Ken Livingstone defended some of Ms Walker's comments, saying "there's a difference between ignorance and anti-Semitism". 
Mr Mann said: "Enough is enough. Though she claims impunity for many reasons, Jackie Walker's behaviour is discriminatory, provocative, offensive and by any standard unacceptable in a modern political party. 
"Not only has she caused offence personally, she has inspired waves of anti-Semitic and racist backlash including Holocaust denial. 
"Not only must she be expelled from the Labour Party immediately but all those abusing others in supporting her must go too. 
"Temporary suspensions are not good enough, these people must be given permanent bans and no platform to express their anti-Semitism anywhere in the Labour Party, if we are to be serious about opposing anti-Jewish hatred."

The Lord Janner case is to be dropped from the child sex inquiry (link). So the old bugger got away with it. I suspect that one reason the people in charge of this inquiry have been resigning is that they realised doing their job honestly would force them to the conclusion that Jews and Muslims had been raping goy/kuffar children and were then shielded from justice by other Jews and Muslims within the political and legal establishments. This corrosion of the state apparatus through ethno-religious nepotism is the darkest of the dark secrets at the heart of this horror. If the inquiry leader came out with that truth, they'd be accused of antisemitism/racism/Islamophobia and their life would be destroyed. Or they could perform a cover-up and endure a torrent of accusations from aggrieved victims.


  1. As was noted at the time, Teresa May's first appointment, after being appointed (not, elected) to head the Conservative Party, was to the Chief Rabbi in Britain and it is quite likely that, in return for Jewish support, she had to agree to sweep all connections of Jews with paedophilia under the carpet. According to the Babylonian Talmud (the central text, along with only the first five chapters of the Old Testament, of Judaism), a girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation (Yebamoth 57b), "A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabited with her she becomes his" (Sanhedrin 69a, 69b and Yebamoth 60b), But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation (Yebamoth 6b Footnote); also the Talmud teaches that an adult woman's molestation of a nine year old boy is "not a sexual act" and cannot "throw guilt" upon her because the little boy is not truly a "man" (Sanhedrin 55a) because "the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act" (Kethuboth 11b Footnote) and "All agree that the (sexual) connection of a boy aged nine years old and a day is a real connection, whilst that of one less than eight years is not" (Sanhedrin 69b) and "At nine years a male attains sexual matureness..The sexual matureness of a woman is reached at the age of three (Sanhedrin 55a).

    When one considers that this is part of prime texts of this ideology, one understands the scope of the perversion and its effects, on both its own adherents, and those who come in contact with it from belief systems which reject such abuse (the words of Jesus Christ Himself re child abuse in the New Testament). Also, the role of media in facilitating, excusing, obfuscating, and covering up, sexual abuse of children and the propagation of sexual perversion, should not be ignored in understanding the moral denigration now in Western civilisation and how it helps to undermine any resistance to threats from this ideology and that of, for example, Islam.