Saturday, 28 May 2016


Acclaimed director Steven Spielberg admitted he was “wrong” to think as a child that anti-Semitism “was fading,” telling Harvard’s graduating class that President Barack Obama was right when he warned that “anti-Semitism is on the rise.” 
Spielberg, whose 99-year-old father Arnold sat in one of the first rows at his address before the Ivy League university’s class of 2016, told the graduates Thursday that the world “is full of monsters” espousing “racism, homophobia, ethnic hatred, class hatred” and “religious hatred.” The Oscar winner also offered veiled criticism of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, known for his anti-migrant rhetoric. 
“We are a nation of immigrants — at least for now,” Spielberg said, and urged the graduates to vote in the upcoming election. “As a kid, I was bullied — for being Jewish,” Spielberg recalled in his speech. 
“This was upsetting, but compared to what my parents and grandparents had faced, it felt tame. Because we truly believed that anti-Semitism was fading. And we were wrong. Over the last two years, nearly 20,000 Jews have left Europe to find higher ground. And earlier this year, I was at the Israeli embassy when President Obama stated the sad truth. He said: ‘We must confront the reality that around the world, anti-Semitism is on the rise. We cannot deny it.’”
Source

Note the contemptuous phrasing "higher ground". There is a lot of anti-Europeanism in Spielberg's films. I should make a post about that some time. But this is a good example of Jews casually slandering the people they live among. Jews leave the countries they live in for all kinds of reasons that have nothing to do with pogroms or antisemitism. Many of them leaving Europe currently are coming from Ukraine. They are fleeing a civil war, not antisemitism. Europe has been experiencing an economic crisis. Many Jews leave for that reason. This could be an interpreted as a sign of Jewish disloyalty. As soon as a country experiences difficulties, the Jews are off somewhere else. They have no deep-rooted commitment to the places they live in. It is perfectly reasonable and moral for any people, living in its ancestral home, to be suspicious of these Oriental nomads for that reason alone. But through the alchemy of "antisemitism" rhetoric, Jewish betrayal of the countries they only recently claimed to be loyal to is excused away in a casual calumniation of the goyim.

7 comments:

  1. Schindler's List is his most famous propaganda movie -
    https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/?s=schindlers+list

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think anti-Semitism is rare. What he sees as anti-Semitism is simply anti-Jewish supremacy. White anti-colonialists fighting to liberate themselves from Talmudic tyranny is a noble cause.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I believe his film, Schindler's List, also contains that deliberate misrepresentation of talmudic teaching: in the film it is presented, to paraphrase it, that 'whosoever saves one life, it is as if he has saved all humanity' and this is misrepesented as judaic teaching. What it actually states is

    Sanhedrin 37a, Babylonian Talmud:-
    "For this reason was man ceated alone, to teach thee that whosoever destroys a single soul of Israel, Scripture imputes {guilt} to him as though he had destroyed a Complete World; and whosoever preserves a single soul of Israel, scripture ascribed {merit} to him as though he had preserved a Complete World."

    Because in judaism, only the jew is fully human, this verse is essentially a highly ethnocentric viewpoint, one which may be understandable from an early, tribal, introverted culture but which through the millenia has served to create and develop barriers, conduct and a hostile ideology to the rest of humanity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. apology for the typo in first line of Sanhedrin quote, it should read "For this reason was man created alone, to....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hay, como en todo donde la mano sionista está presente, una manipulación ( y tergiversación de las palabras y hechos ), pues en la cita ( traducida al castellano y original en idioma internacional anglosajón ) :

    "Somos una nación de inmigrantes - al menos por ahora", dijo Spielberg, e instó a los graduados para votar en la próxima elección. "Cuando era niño, yo estaba intimidado - por ser judío," Spielberg recordó en su discurso.

    Fin de la cita.

    Hay un error original en tales palabras proclamadas por nuestro amigo director de cine ; pues, no es el origen de U.S.A. inmigrante , pues, es ésto otro : emigrante.

    Estados Unidos de Norteamérica fue conquistado para llevar una cultura occidental, y la mayor parte de toda América se pobló de gente occidental, por lo tanto de EMIGRANTES ---- NO INMIGRANTES ----. Luego, después, aparecieron diversas culturas con la interacción de los occidentales, como fue el caso de el uso de la mano de obra esclava, y los nativos ( muchos de ellos salvajes y habituales de la antropofagia ) indígenas ( indios ). Por eso el occidental de América ( toda América ) no es inmigrante, todo lo contrario : es emigrante, y que ha heredado la cultura occidental ( que es lo mismo que decir Cristianismo, éste enemigo del pueblo deicida hasta el C. Vaticano II ).

    En muchos países se utiliza la palabra migrante para los dos aspectos distintos ( inmigrante y emigrante ), posiblemente influidos por las políticas sionistas, sobre todo en América latina, y otros países anglófilos.

    Relacionados factores impagables de investigación compartida :
    El gran fraude, un ejemplo, parece ser, de las películas de éste señor director de cine :
    http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?s=75ae9a3fb5c669c32f4793403e12a0a7&t=381721


    Saludos Diversity, noticias importantes para el sentido lógico y común de las personas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. El vídeo ha sido censurado, parece ser.

      Lo cual, eleva aún más la verdad documentada, aún siendo censurado.

      Delete
  6. I like this article. Speilbug is a paedojew. Monsters are too good for them. It seems old fashioned, but the conversos in western churches, and the pseudo-atheists are still deeply ruinous of the nations, faiths and people they occupy. Napoleon made a mistake, we could easily return to traditional protection laws for professions, faith, military and banking. As fun and smart as they think they are, orientalism has no functioning place in the Western nation builds or lovely old Europe.

    ReplyDelete