Wednesday, 18 May 2016

10 comments:

  1. Something else is a Republican form of government based on Classical Liberal ideals.
    The problem is that only a truly Christian people can properly operate that form of government.

    As we have seen in the USA, once you add Jews to the population they work to destroy Christian culture and debase laws.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And how will the laws of this Republic be decided? If by elected representatives, then it's still a representative democracy.

      Delete
    2. You can have a representative democracy with no Constitution. You can't have a Republican form of government without a Constitution. While Representative Democracy is a portion of of a Constitutional Republic, only a Republican form of government has Constitutional laws that cannot be changed by simple majorities. The effect of these Constitutional laws is to circumscribe those representatives.

      But like all things made by man this system can be corrupted by the corrupt. But only if the People have become so corrupted that they cannot discern what is going wrong.

      Delete
  2. I support a direct democracy where only the votes of people who pay taxes are valid.

    This will decrease the power of both low IQ groups and over-liberal women, as white men pay the biggest amount of taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I believe in the combination of a Republic and Monarchy. The blending of the principals of top down and bottom up authority structures while combining in harmony centralized and decentralized power structures. In many ways National Socialism does this but where it goes wrong is in their (or many of them) belief in Macro-Evolution (only Micro Evolution is scientific) and that somehow Man is to be bound by the laws of the Animal Kingdoms. This could be corrected by making the central theme of the individual and racial collective in a National Socialist society based upon creation/science and worship of truth/reason/light exemplified by Jesus Christ the white man/God who's our ethnic kinfolk, High Priest and King. Making these corrections produces a winning combination for the white man that can take over the "Jews" JWO out of "Israel"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Elective monarchy with the leader elected by an aristocracy.

    Leaders can't be faced with the need to be re-elected if they are going to properly evaluate decisions with a low time preference. I suppose it's not all that different from dictatorship in the end, but it allows for an upper class to choose who should be the leader rather than some asshole just seizing power.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Any strictly Europid ethno-state of a Classical Liberal structure, working with authentic usury free money, and a military strategy for defending its principles against orientalist encroachment and attack, possibly with some kind of traditional, monarchic or Imperial backdrop -- although there are latent ancestral infestations there as well. Features such as professional protection laws screening ethnic out-groups from practice, government, ownership and citizenship. A state that abolishes freemasonry in all its forms. The reclaiming of western technological and knowledge investitures from tradecraft, banking and globalist trillionaires. A state that does not recognize religious ecumenical egalitarianism, or expropriative economism.

    ReplyDelete
  6. direct democracy. people can overrule their government on any issue and also introduce new ideas into the political system. like the Swiss do with a basic income, in 3 weeks is the vote! its also a long process starting with collecting subs , then get a date for the public vote, so people get informed and involved much more. and they make good decisions like a ban on minarets.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Aristocracy / Meritocracy

    ReplyDelete