Thursday, 28 April 2016


The latest manufacturted "antisemitism" crisis currently engulfing the Labour party is a good illustration of Jewish power in action. It begins with a Facebook post made by a Muslim MP, Naz Shah (who displaced George Galloway), representing the Muslim colony of Bradford. 




Now Shah's post is obviously anti-Israel. But she doesn't say a word about Jews in it. Her reference to Hitler was quoted yesterday in aghast tones by the dim-witted Andrew Neil on the Daily Politics show. "What goes through someone's head when they say something like that?" he asked plaintively. So let's look at it. Here's the Guardian's account.
She wrote the caption #ApartheidIsrael on a picture that appeared to compare the state to the Nazis. It was above a picture of Dr Martin Luther King holding the quote: “We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal’.”
Source

The point being made here is obviously that wrongful things can be done under the guise of legality. What she said isn't antisemitic at all. It's philosemitic. It implies sympathy for the Jews. If she was the "Jew hater" that is now being claimed, she presumably would have approved of what Hitler had done, not considered it wrongful.

Former mayor of London Ken Livingstone has also been dragged into it now and suspended. His crime? He said that Hitler originally wanted to expel the Jews, not exterminate them, something that is generally accepted by historians.

The most significant aspect of the "scandal" is how confected bogus it all is. There was no antisemitism at all on display from either the Muslim MP or Ken Livingstone. But Jew power being what it is, the truth doesn't really matter. Reason doesn't matter. Try to discuss the matter rationally and all you get is emotion, hysteria, intimidation and exclusion. This is Jew power at work.

The video shows Livingstone's fellow Labour MP, John Mann, haranguing him on the steps as he walks into a television studio. Mann is chairman of the all-party committee on antisemitism. He may well be the most pitiful Judenknecht I have ever seen. He disputes that Hitler wanted to transfer Jews to Palestine. So he's an extract from the Encyclopedia Judaica on the Haavara Agreement:

HAAVARA, a company for the transfer of Jewish property from Nazi Germany to Palestine. The Trust and Transfer Office Haavara Ltd., was established in Tel Aviv, following an agreement with the German government in August 1933, to facilitate the emigration of Jews to Palestine by allowing the transfer of their capital in the form of German export goods. The Haavara Agreement is an instance where the question of Jewish rights, Zionist needs and individual rescue were in deep tension. Jewish organizations outside of Germany had declared a boycott against German goods and hoped to delegitimate the Nazi regime. The Zionists saw this agreement as a way of attracting Jews to Palestine and thus rescuing them from the Nazi universe even if that meant cooperation with Hitler. For a time the Nazi program of making Germany Judenrein and the Zionist policy of seeking olim coincided. The amounts to be transferred were paid by prospective emigrants into the account of a Jewish trust company (PALTREU – Palestina Treuhandstelle zur Beratung deutscher Juden) in Germany and used for the purchase of goods, which the Haavara then sold in Palestine. The proceeds, in Palestine currency, were paid to the emigrants living in Palestine. The rate of exchange was adjusted from time to time by the Haavara according to the disagio, necessitated by the subsidy which the Haavara granted the Palestinian importers, to make up for the steadily deteriorating value of the Reich mark, so the German goods could compete with other imports. The ensuing disagio, borne by the emigrants, accordingly increased from 6% in 1934 to 50% in 1938. The major part of the transfer proceeds provided the 1,000 Palestine Pounds (then $4,990) necessary for a "capitalist" immigration certificate of the Mandatory administration, but also for other categories of immigration, such as Youth Aliyah, students, and artisans as well as for the transfer of public funds. The transfer weakened the boycott of German goods declared by many Jewish organizations around the world, and thus met with considerable opposition. The controversy was settled at the Zionist Congress in Lucerne (1935) which decided by a vast majority in favor of the transfer and placed the Haavara under the supervision of the *Jewish Agency . The Zionists sought to attract immigrants to Palestine, most especially the affluent German Jewish immigrants and the Germans sought to get rid of their Jews, increase their exports and a propaganda victory by dividing the Jews regarding the boycott. The Haavara continued to function until World War II, in spite of vigorous attempts by the Nazi Party to stop or curtail its activities. The total transfer amounted to LP 8,100,000 (Palestine Pounds; then $40,419,000) including LP 2,600,000 (then $13,774,000) provided by the German Reichsbank in coordination with Haavara. The Haavara transfer was a major factor in making possible the immigration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine in the years 1933–1939, and together with the money invested by the immigrants themselves, in providing an incentive for the expansion of agricultural settlement and for general economic development. It also served as a model for a similar arrangement with the Czech government and the immigration of several thousand Jews on the eve of World War II.
Source


Jews have been out to get Corbyn from the start, just like they are out to get Trump in America. Why? Because he met some Palestinian once, or some nonsense that relates to a foreign country, Israel, and has nothing to do with Britain. Unusually, Jews are not even attempting to disguise their antipathy to Corbyn. It's quite openly discussed in the Jewish Chronicle.

This so-called "scandal" is nothing but a Jewish concoction designed to damage Corbyn. Jeremy Corbyn, incidentally, for those outside of Britain, is a kind of British Bernie Sanders, a fringe leftist who has somehow managed to take control of the party. Pro-immigration and pro-Islam, he is a complete joke and would do extraordinary damage to the country if he ever became Prime Minister. Nonetheless, millions of (genuinely) British people have vested their hopes for the future of their country in him. They are entitled to feel indignant when they see those hopes being undermined by an alien people living among them, pretending to be British but in reality actuated by concerns that have nothing to do with Britain.

2 comments:

  1. Those various Transfer Agreements employed by Germany, the Czech government and likely others, certainly go some way to explaining what happened to that infamous six million number, along with, it should be added, the Soviet Union's activities at the same time in arranging for the transfer of about 2,000,000 jews from parts of the German Reich into the Soviet Union (and it should be recalled that 85% of the leadership of the Soviet Union and 67% of its NKVD arm were Jewish or of Jewish background.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aquí, en España, estamos igual o peor.

    El discurso manipulado, y la Historia del victimismo ( sentimiento constante de víctima por hechos dudosos, o la victimización ) aparece siempre en los Medios de Masas ( la Mass Media ), ya que están controlados por los grupos afines elitistas simpatizantes de algunas minorías en nombre del Semitismo.

    La raza semita, en realidad, no es exclusiva de los judíos, es un error, promocionado por la gente negligente e ignorante, naturalmente ésto se debe a las políticas de siglos atrás con diversos autores de propaganda literaria. La raza semita hay que encuadrarla o definirse también con los árabes, y otros grupos étnicos cuando aparece la palabra semita, con el Arca de Noé, y las zonas donde se presume que se concentraban esas gentes o pueblos semitas.

    Por tanto, el discurso del Anti-semitismo, es nulo, ya que numerosos sionistas ( judíos o masones ) promueven --- sin saberlo --- el mensaje anti-semita, contra, entre otras cosas, el conflicto Palestino, las excesivas críticas ( de odio ) e incluso persecución al mundo árabe ( que no necesariamente tiene que estar relacionado con la religión del Islam ).

    El Anti-semitismo es una invención absurda, exclusiva, para la protección política de una supuesta raza y cultura después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, que ya no tiene fuerza ; pues hay derechos internacionales que lo avalan, como por ejemplo la protección de las personas, en ellas ( en las personas ) se sobreentiende por encima de todo : a cualquier persona o ser humano. Por lo que el Anti-semitismo no tiene razón de ser y sí los derechos fundamentales en la Carta Magna de las Naciones Unidas. Estos factores contradictorios, resumen el protagonismo contemporáneo de unos y otros grupos de poder o de élite, para hacer ver su influencia internacional, y, naturalmente sacar beneficio por cualquier motivo que se use la palabra o trabajo ; Anti-semitismo.

    Muchas gracias Diversity, como siempre, noticias muy bien seleccionadas, y que hacen reflexionar a todos, sobre todo, a los occidentales.

    ReplyDelete