Saturday, 30 April 2016

The extent of the divide within Labour was highlighted when David Rosenberg, an ally of Mr Corbyn and co-founder of Jews for Jeremy, said that the Board of Deputies was “part of the problem, not part of the solution”. 
Writing in the latest edition of Labour Briefing, a monthly magazine of the hard left, Mr Rosenberg suggested that those on the right of the party and other groups were using antisemitism claims to attack Mr Corbyn, and that the Board of Deputies was part of that. 
He wrote: “The Board of Deputies, which falsely claims to be the ‘representative’ body of British Jews, has waded in too. Jonathan Arkush, its president, told The Standard that the ‘Jewish community could not trust Labour any more’. 
In truth the targets are both Corbyn and Palestine. The ardently pro-Zionist Board of Deputies, in particular, is using the Palestine issue to play party politics.”
Source (£)

A Jewish donor to Labour has also been calling for him to resign.
David Abrahams, who has given more than £600,000 to the party but has now halted his funding, said that he could no longer remain silent and called for Mr Corbyn to step down. 
“We’ve got to have a fresh start — we need proper policies and not arguing, backbiting and backstabbing,” he said. “We need to review the leadership, without a shadow of a doubt. We need a leadership built to set an example from the top. I think it is time now for Corbyn to review his situation. I’m just not inclined to be part of this pantomime. It’s time [for MPs to speak out] after next week’s local elections.”
Source (£)
Last night, Mr Abrahams said that it was time for Mr Corbyn to step down. “Jewish people don't even like the name Labour mentioned at this time," he told Channel 4 News.

Notice how he is allowed to acknowledge the phenomenon of Jewish ethno-political action as a collectivity. But when Naz Shah says "The Jews are rallying" it's considered "antisemitism".

This pseudo-scandal is a good illustration of Jewish power in action. All of the tribe members in the media move into action in pursuit of a common agenda, an agenda that has nothing to do with the country they live in. This manufactured "crisis" had nothing to do with antisemitism to begin with; but it will certainly provoke antisemitism as millions of Corbyn supporters see their hopes for change cheated by an alien power living among them.

Update: 80 Jewish members of the Labour party published a letter in the Guardian today confirming the analysis above.

We are Jewish members and supporters of the Labour party and of Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, who wish to put our perspective on the “antisemitism” controversy that has been widely debated in the last few weeks (Labour’s antisemitism crisis as Livingstone suspended, 29 April). We do not accept that antisemitism is “rife” in the Labour party. Of the examples that have been repeated in the media, many have been reported inaccurately, some are trivial, and a very few may be genuine examples of antisemitism. The tiny number of cases of real antisemitism need to be dealt with, but we are proud that the Labour party historically has been in the forefront of the fight against all forms of racism. We, personally, have not experienced any antisemitic prejudice in our dealings with Labour party colleagues.

We believe these accusations are part of a wider campaign against the Labour leadership, and they have been timed particularly to do damage to the Labour party and its prospects in elections in the coming week. As Jews, we are appalled that a serious issue is being used in this cynical and manipulative way, diverting attention from much more widespread examples of Islamophobia and xenophobia in the Conservative and other parties. We dissociate ourselves from the misleading attacks on Labour from some members of the Jewish community. We urge others, who may be confused or worried by recent publicity, to be sure that the Labour party, under its present progressive leadership, is a place where Jews are welcomed in a spirit of equality and solidarity.

Kate Adams Julia Bard Labina Basit Shereen Benjamin Rica Bird Jenny Bloom Alice Bondi Elizabeth Carola Ron Cohen Judith Cravitz Dave Curtis Miriam E David Sue Dellett Ivor Dembina Professor Stephen Deutsch Merave Devere Shlomit Ferguson Mark Findlay Hava Fleming Dr William Fleming Roisin Francis Kenneth Fryde Lynda Gilbert Clare Glasman Alex J Goldhill Adam Goodkin Stuart Goodman Tony Graham Tony Greenstein Michele Hanson Rosamine Hayeem Abe Hayeem Jane Henriques Lorraine Hershon Becka Seglow Hudson Selma James Saul Jamuels Riva Joffe Michael Kalmanovitz David Kaye Richard Kuper Pam Laurance Leah Levane Rachel Lever Sue Lukes Eli Machover Beryl Maizels Miriam Margolyes Stephen Marks Helen Marks Karen Merkel Charles Shaar Murray Professor Mica Nava Diana Neslen Bracha Newman Rabbi Jeffrey Newman Susan Pashkoff Rina Picciotto Caroline Raine Roland Rance Frances Rifkin Dr Brian Robinson Denise Robson Jeff Daniel Rollin David Rosenberg Jonathan Rosenhead Stephen Sands Dr Ian Saville Amanda Sebastyen Glyn Secker Elizabeth Segal Lynne Segal Ray Sirotkin Steve Tiller Ray Sirotkin Inbar Tamari Tirza Waisel Sam Weinstein Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi Benjamin Young Gill Yudkin Professor John Yudkin

It looks as though Lumpengoyim John Mann may well get a reward from his masters for his faithful, if clueless, service.


  1. Gilad Atzmon, writing yesterday: ‘If anyone had so far failed to notice the corrosive impact of Jewish power and Jewish political lobbying, it is now all out in the open. Thanks to the Jewish Lobby and Jewish donors, the Labour Party is not a free place. It is intolerant, it is oppressive, it is an occupied territory. It cares for one people only and these people are not the working class. They are, practically speaking, a bunch of Jewish oligarchs, by far the most privileged people on this planet.’

    Atzmon, writing in March: ‘I’ve been reporting on Jeremy Corbyn’s shameless capitulation to the Jewish Lobby. The long time campaigner for Palestine has, in just a few weeks, been reduced into a sad Zionist puppet whose position on Israel has descended into a copy of a Likud pamphlet.’

  2. "diverting attention from much more widespread examples of Islamophobia"

    Maybe you should use bold for this too, as it shows the jewish support for muslims.

  3. Si los servicios de inteligencia ( con sus comunicaciones ) hicieran de forma pública : las informaciones de comunicaciones entre La Masonería y los políticos occidentales la gente estaría ya huyendo alarmada de la situación política en Occidente.

    Ésto no es caso exclusivo de un determinado país o nación, ocurre en todo Occidente, pero la gente está más preocupada de su jubilación, del fútbol, o de la prensa del Corazón, y luego todo se complica todavía más, y es entonces donde aparecen las preguntas de la ciudadanía que ya no puede aguantar más problemas de todo tipo y maneras.

    La única solución, por rara o drástica que parezca, es optar por los partidos políticos patriotas o identitarios. Con esa solución fácil, la mayoría de los problemas se resuelven rápidamente. Pero no son promocionados, y algunas veces censurados para que la gente sea dependiente de un club elitista mundial.

    Ese club elitista mundial está intentando desde hace décadas crear un gobierno mundial único, y fomentando la destrucción de la identidad e Historia de los pueblos, sobre todo el Occidental.

    Lo dicho, no es una situación exclusiva de un país, éstas situaciones aparecen de una forma u otra en otras naciones occidentales. Con suerte la gente despierte y abra los ojos.

  4. My assessment of this trumped-up 'anti-semitism' brouhaha is that the Jews now realise that they must engage in a damage limitation exercise: you will notice that Livingstone's remarks regarding the Transfer Agreement between the German Government under Hitler and the Zionists intent on creating a Jewish State out of Palestine have now largely been ignored quite pointedly by the entire British media. This is because, to state the facts and historical background of that Transfer Agreement (as CZ has done so concisely here at DMF, would open the proverbial Pandora's Box, leading to people openly, publicly questioning the "received wisdom" of the "Holocaust", and once that happens, people will also start adding up not only the shocking human cost in terms of millions of dead Europeans/Americans/Australians/NewZealanders/Canadians who probably died needlessly to facilitate these machinations of Zionists, Communists et al, but also, of course, the monetary cost in terms of "reparations" to supposed "survivors" of said holocaust, and the ongoing costs of memorials to it, propaganda operations to keep it in the public mind and, last but hardly least, the role this entire scheme has played in helping to silence or almost totally destroy freedom of speech in Europe whilst at the same time deliberately encouraging the invasion of Europe by hostile peoples and the possible enslavement and/or genocide of Europeans in their own lands.

    Don't be fooled by the chatter about needing new policies, politicians for a British party: this is about keeping the truth unknown to the greater public in the West.