Friday, 15 April 2016

Although I still consider myself part of the Counterjihad movement in the broadest sense, meaning I am opposed to the Mohammedanisation of Europe and the work, my break with the Counterjihad movement in the narrow sense came after reading the books of Kevin MacDonald.

I then realised that Jewish pro-immigrationism - something I had already taken note of - was something more than the casual, instinctive leftism I had interpreted it as being, something far more systematic and sinister; and that it was the hidden force behind the islamisation of the western world. As I began to explore these issues on my blog, virtually all members of the CounterJewhad movement, these supposed champions of free speech, people who proudly dubbed themselves "thought criminals", severed their ties with me, proving themselves no better than and no different to the Establishment thinkers they mocked. It became apparent that the Counterjihad movement was actually the CounterJewhad movement. Almost all of its activists either were Jewish or had financial or psychological dependencies on Jews. They were not interested in the salvation of Europe but the salvation of Jewry.

If you haven't read Kevin MacDonald's books then you really should read them. Without them, you simply do not have the conceptual tools to understand what is happening to us. But here is the next best thing, an introduction to MacDonald's books and ideas in the form of a conversation between Kevin McDonald himself and Patrick Slattery on a recent radio programme.



6 comments:

  1. Personally i woke up because of prof. Mcdonald. From 2001 to 2012 i thought that the problem is Islam and nothing else.

    But Islam was just a simptom of the larger problem. The body of the West is ill, eaten by the j parasite. Islam is just the oportunistic infection that takes advantage of a body without an immune system.

    When one parasite weakens the body, then other parasites, like Islam, move in as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quite right and, historically, European countries faced with either the threat of, or actual conquest, by Islam, realised that parasitism had weakened them and, if unchecked, would make it well nigh impossible to resist or overthrow Islamic power; one could apply this also to the threat of Bolshevism. First you rid yourself or restrict the power of the parasite, then the more outwardly dangerous enemy can be dealt with by national spirit, superior intelligence and proven fighting skills.

      Delete
  2. "I then realised that Jewish pro-immigrationism - something I had already taken note of - was something more than the casual, instinctive leftism I had interpreted it as being, something far more systematic and sinister; and that it was the hidden force behind the islamisation of the western world. As I began to explore these issues on my blog, virtually all members of the CounterJewhad movement, these supposed champions of free speech, people who proudly dubbed themselves "thought criminals", severed their ties with me, proving themselves no better than and no different to the Establishment thinkers they mocked. It became apparent that the Counterjihad movement was actually the CounterJewhad movement. Almost all of its activists either were Jewish or had financial or psychological dependencies on Jews. They were not interested in the salvation of Europe but the salvation of Jewry." Except Macdonald is a hack: https://web.archive.org/web/20110603231801/http://www.h-net.org/~antis/papers/dl/macdonald_schatz_01.html
    http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/06/critique-of-culture-of-kevin-macdonald.html
    http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004495.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you the Jew Jacob Blaustein?

      http://ryu238.deviantart.com/

      Delete
    2. Takuan Seiyo's review of Culture of Critique is notable for its weakness. He basically says that MacDonald may be right but his motives for addressing this issue might be impure (in other words he's an "antisemite") so nothing that he says counts.

      I've written before about this curiously Oriental form of discourse that attacks a person's motivation for saying something rather than addressing the merits of what it is they say. I believe this has its roots in the traditional Jewish legal system, which could invalidate a witness' testimony if their motivation could be judged suspect.(Link)

      Commenters on this blog have previously claimed Seiyo himself is Jewish, using a fake Japanese name.

      Delete
  3. The wonderful thing about MacDonald is that his arguments are based on the Jews’ own words and deeds, which reveal their consuming hatred of the white race and of Christianity.

    ReplyDelete