Monday, 29 February 2016



The negro "poet" - his poetry is ridiculous doggerel - Benjamin Zephaniah has contributed a foreword to a book called "Angry White Men". It has just been published in the Guardian and you can read it there (link). In it he recounts his "heroic" resistance to "racist" indigenes who apparently did not appreciate his presence in their land.



 I posted this comment underneath the article but correctly predicted it would be deleted, so I now reproduce it here.
If the indigenous people using violence against unwanted foreigners arriving in their ancestral homeland were native Americans or Australian aborigines or Indians resisting British imperial colonisation, you would sympathise with them not the targets of their violence. 
The talk of "swamping" was completely accurate. Virtually all demographic projections show an Afro-Asian majority in Britain by the end of this century. So, in barely 100 years, an entire country, with a long-established, functioning society, will have been demographically conquered by incoming aliens. There is almost no precedent for this in history. Why should Europeans, or indeed any people, be expected to make themselves an ethnic minority in their own ancestral homeland and be told they are evil if they express any misgivings or hesitation about the prospect? 
Consider the possibility that the moral turpitude is on your side; that it is actually not moral to force your presence on another people's ancestral land if they clearly don't want you to be there. 
And it would be interesting to know how many indigenous Britons had been killed by blacks compared to the other way around. I suspect the disparity in numbers would not favour your argument.

5 comments:

  1. Yo recomiendo no perder el tiempo con éstas cosas.

    Es ignorancia pura y dura, con tintes de política.

    Algunas veces éstas cosas, escuecen, porque al leer siempre a Marx, ocurre.

    http://www.elmanifiesto.com/articulos.asp?idarticulo=4449

    Y, ni siquiera vamos a ubicar información del Imperio Español, que desconoce, totalmente, el supuesto poeta.

    Cualquiera es poeta, hoy en día...

    ReplyDelete
  2. "If the indigenous people using violence against unwanted foreigners arriving in their ancestral homeland were native Americans or Australian aborigines or Indians resisting British imperial colonisation, you would sympathise with them not the targets of their violence. " Because the colonizers were violent. Today...not so much. False equivalence.
    "Virtually all demographic projections show an Afro-Asian majority in Britain by the end of this century. So, in barely 100 years, an entire country, with a long-established, functioning society, will have been demographically conquered by incoming aliens. There is almost no precedent for this in history" considering Australia and America...not so much unprecedented...wow you are dumb, especially since your projections r phony: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0ahUKEwjex_jotZ3LAhWJPiYKHThOARkQtwIIIjAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DsfY3LqOpTLc&usg=AFQjCNH95YKwprxg9fVAf2jOyvtPlRgw9w
    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Eurabia
    So you are trying to use false equivalence to support the idea of a phony demographic collapse...I am sorry bitch.
    "Consider the possibility that the moral turpitude is on your side; that it is actually not moral to force your presence on another people's ancestral land if they clearly don't want you to be there." Ask yourself if the natives have a good reason other than fear...https://exposingbf.wordpress.com/2015/08/09/rotherhams-white-grooming-gangs/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ Jacob—considering Australia and America...not so much unprecedented

      Before colonization, Australia was not an entire country with a functioning society. Rather, it comprised hundreds of ‘communities made up of people who spoke different languages with various cultural beliefs, practices and traditions. Before 1788 there were approximately 700 languages spoken throughout Australia with an estimated population of 750 000 people.’

      Similarly, America was/is home to around 150 tribes with ‘no single Native American language’.

      Delete
    2. Jewcob, violence has been used against the peoples of Europe to intimidate them into accepting the alien presence: principally the violent, coercive powers of the state, but also lower-level violence from the colonists themselves.

      Demographic studies show a non-European majority this century:

      http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/white-britons-will-be-minority-before-2070-says-professor-8600262.html

      You quote the most ridiculous "Eurabia" predictions and debunk them. I've debunked them myself. The fact that some people (mostly Americans) have made ridiculous demographic projections does not alter the fact that most of the countries of western Europe will have non-European majorities by the end of this century if present trends continue.

      The link to a supposed report about Rotherham on the web page you link to is dead so I can't verify it. Most likely they are talking about child abuse generally, rather than specifically the far more sinister group-based abuse. An individual deviant does not remotely compare to a community of deviancy where dozens of men harbour contempt and animosity for the indigenous people of this island.

      The fear is justified. There is no example of successful persistent racial co-existence throughout history.

      Delete
    3. Nature will always correct itself. A species that can not feed or maintain it's self will go extinct. US Whites if (if) we are overrun by lesser species will still have the last laugh. Without us you die period.

      Delete