Friday, 26 June 2015

The suspect was arrested shortly after the attack. It was a fireman from the SDIS of Isère (Service Départemental d’Incendie et de Secours) [Municipal Fire and Emergency Service] who was called on to control the fire and explosion who "neutralised him with a lot of coursage and sang-froid" declared Bernard Cazeneuve.
This fireman, whose identity is, today, being kept secret to protect him, "proceeded to incapacitate" this individual, said the Minister of the Interior. Bernard Cazeneuve insisted on thanking him as well as his colleagues for the "promptness and efficiency of this intervention".  
The Isère chief of police Jean-Paul Bonnetain, also emphasised the courage of the fireman: "the suspect defended himself, you can imagine and (the fireman) was slightly injured. But he took control of the situation and he was able to hand the individual in question over to the police."  
"Help me protect the identity of this person," insisted the chief of police, "I believe his personal safety is at stake!".

What does it say about the state of Europe that the identity of a national hero who thwarts a terrorist attack has to be concealed for fear of reprisals from the Muslim fifth column?


  1. Why don’t muslim "asylum seekers" go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.

    How has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Name one. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called “racist” and “Nazis” if they let them in, their country, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Wake up before it’s too late.

  2. All Muslims and all Jews must be expelled from ALL Aryan nations. These groups always end up subverting and destroying their host nations.

    Jews are racists when it comes to Israel, but promote race-mixing for everyone else.