Thursday, 16 April 2015


Greville Janner Gets Away With It Again by zakalwe2





It's interesting that this most recent inquiry concluded that the previous inquiries, in deciding not to prosecute, made the wrong decision. It clearly states that the evidentiary threshold for prosecution was reached in this case and in previous cases, validating the suspicions that improper influence was brought to bear. Of course none of the reporting dares to mention the issue of ethnic favouritism or point out that many of those making the key decisions at the various points in this saga were Jews, an issue of obvious relevance when dealing with a man who was one of the world's most prominent Jews, having been chairman of the Board of Deputies in Britain and president of the World Jewish Congress.

Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions who made this decision, does not appear to be Jewish but she has shown a tendency to conform with the multicult agenda. For example, she made the decision to re-prosecute the people who had previously been acquitted of killing Stephen Lawrence, a case that was used as an ideological weapon by genocide diversity campaigners. As a high-profile campaigner against European survival racism, Saunders would surely have been concerned that discrediting Janner would have damaged the authority of the multicult.


UPDATE: It seems Janner was attending the House of Lords regularly until about a year and a half ago. I also saw an interview he did a few years ago and he looks to have perfect mental acuity. It is simply not credible that he has somehow degenerated so fast psychologically that he is not aware of what is going on around him.


Greville Janner - The Hammer of the Goy by zakalwe2


 Here is a clip of Greville Janner last year. Does this really look like a guy who doesn't know what's going on around him?


 

4 comments:

  1. And now the Jew lord Neuberger has decreed that we must be more tolerant to people from other cultures in that last bastion of Britishness, the Courts:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11543712/Muslim-women-should-be-allowed-to-wear-the-veil-in-court-top-judge-suggests.html

    Interestingly, a lot of muslims made very silly and predictable comments, including veil'd threats, at the end:

    "Suleman Nagdi, of the Leicester-based Federation of Muslim Organisations, described Lord Neuberger’s remarks as “heart-warming and really welcome”.

    “This is what our great British system is built on: respect for the other,” he said.

    “We must remember that there is an impact on legislation in other parts of the world whenever we show good practice in the United Kingdom.

    “I am sure that this example will be followed in other parts of the world which are less tolerant in respecting minority communities.”"

    "Dr Shuja Shafi, Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: ““No one disputes that in the dispensation of justice, the law of the land must be upheld. Lord Neuberger’s eminently sensible statement also upholds our best British traditions of accommodation and fair play."

    I thought the best British Tradition was conquering other cultures and forcing them into abandoning barbaric practices (such as the Hindu sati) not accommodating them?

    But it was interesting that a Jew was making this demand upon the slavish Goy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It should be noted that the Jewish Board of Deputies were instrumental in drafting, proposing and securing the passing of all "hate speech" and "anti-racism" laws which have effectively silenced any opposition to the ongoing cultural, religious, racial and civilisational destruction of the British peoples, and, by extension, all Caucasian and Christian countries. Also, a surprisingly high number of the UK's Home Secretaries have been Jewish and facilitated this project in all its maleficent aspects. The English judiciary is also heavily weighted with Jews who in some cases are at the very top of the courts, and this has resulted in a deliberate misdirection of law to accord with Judaic concepts such as speech restrictions.

    As for sexual abuse of children, this is well-documented in the Talmud which is the written culmination of the oral traditions present centuries before in Judaism and it is the Talmud which is one of the core texts of this ideology. When an ideology contains approval of such perversion, it cannot be dismissed simply as arcane or the rantings of a deluded minority, especially when that 'minority', rabbis, are the teachers of this ideology and hold esteemed positions of authority and control over their 'communities':

    "Rabbi Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his." (Sanhedrin 55b, 69a, 69 and in Yebamoth 60b, Talmud)

    "A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation" (Yebamoth 57b, Talmud)

    As to a boy aged younger than nine years, he is regarded as sexually immature and therefore cannot ascribe guilt to an adult female abusing him: "At nine years a male attains sexual matureness...The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three." (Sanhedrin 55a, Talmud)

    There are numerous cases of rabbis, in Western countries and in Israel, who sexually abuse the children in their classes and under their 'care'; it is never acknowledged by the largely Jewish-owned "mass media", that the basis of this resides in the ideology's teachings. Whereas the abuse of children by Catholic priests, acting in complete violation of Christ's own precepts (and his implicit warning against child abuse), are constantly and hypocritically referred to by Jews and their media agents. One has only to peruse the 'counter-jihad' sites to read of the numerous Hadiths (and the Koran's inference re child marriage) to be assured of Islam's support for paedophilia and, when the subject of child "marriage" arises in early Islam, these same sites, largely Jewish-owned and run, will engage in deliberate evasion and misdirection by noting, as Spencer at Jihad Watch, that 'child marriage' was 'common' "in that time period".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Don't expect the courts in any EU country to crack down on Jew criminals like this. They are protecting their own kind -
    www.counter-currents.com/2010/11/the-jewish-mafia-an-interview-with-herve-ryssen/

    ReplyDelete